Few subjects are as intensely debated in the United States as the death penalty.
Some form of capital punishment has existed in America for hundreds of years,
yet the justification for carrying out the ultimate sentence is a continuing source
of controversy. No Winners Here Tonight explores the history of the death
penalty and the question of its fairness through the experience of a single state,
Ohio, which, despite its moderate midwestern values, has long had one of the
country’s most active death chambers.
In 1958, just four states accounted for half of the forty-eight executions carried
out nationwide, each with six: California, Georgia, Ohio, and Texas. By the first
decade of the new century, Ohio was second only to Texas in the number of
people put to death each year. No Winners Here Tonight looks at this trend and
determines that capital punishment has been carried out in an uneven fashion
from its earliest days, with outcomes based not on blind justice but on the color
of a person’s skin, the whim of a local prosecutor, or the biases of the jury pool
in the county in which a crime was committed.
Andrew Welsh-Huggins’s work is the only comprehensive study of the history of
the death penalty in Ohio. His analysis concludes that the current law, crafted by
lawmakers to punish the worst of the state’s killers, doesn’t come close to its
intended purpose and instead varies widely in its implementation. Welsh-Huggins takes on this controversial topic evenhandedly and with respect for the
humanity of the accused and the victim alike. This exploration of the law of
capital punishment and its application will appeal to students of criminal justice
as well as those with an interest in law and public policy.